Work with Ravi

I run three production AI SaaS solo (Prism, Citare, BatchWise) and write about the actual mechanics of LLM FinOps. If your AI spend is meaningful and you want practitioner-level help — not a Big-4-style slide deck — here's how to engage.

Who I work with

Indian mid-market companies (typically ₹50 crore - ₹2,000 crore revenue) with material AI / cloud spend, and solo founders or small engineering teams running production AI products with monthly LLM bills above $10K. If your AI bill is under $1K/mo, you don't need me yet — read the LLM FinOps explainer and the $5/month production stack first.

What I do

1. AI Systems Review

Bespoke ₹2-15L · 4-8 weeks · founder-delivered

Six-domain independent review across AI spend attribution, vendor consolidation, model selection, cloud architecture for AI workloads, Indian regulatory overlay (SEBI / ICAI / DPDP / RBI), and internal controls. Output: written report with findings, quantified optimisation roadmap, governance framework, and executive deck.

Not a statutory audit. Advisory in nature; you retain decision authority.

2. AI Spend & Tax Optimisation

Bespoke ₹50K-3L · 2-4 weeks · founder-delivered

Tax-recovery diagnostic across five sub-domains: GST input credit on AI / cloud imports, Section 195 TDS reconciliation with DTAA relief, Reverse Charge Mechanism on imported services, capex vs opex classification under Ind AS, transfer pricing on cross-entity AI cost allocation. Output: quantified recovery roadmap your existing CA can execute against.

Not a tax opinion or filing service. Diagnostic only; implementation runs through your existing CA firm.

3. LLM FinOps Coaching

Monthly retainer, scope-dependent · ongoing

Embedded coaching for an engineering or finance team implementing LLM FinOps discipline — cost attribution architecture, caching, model routing, retry hygiene, governance — without hiring a full-time specialist. Two calls per month plus async review of code and dashboards.

Fit: teams with $10K-$100K/mo LLM spend who want capability inside the team, not a vendor relationship.

Why bespoke pricing

Engagement scope varies too much across entities for fixed tiers to be honest. A multi-BU group with ₹50 crore annual AI spend and EU subsidiary exposure has fundamentally different requirements than a single-entity SaaS with ₹3 crore spend. The free 30-minute discovery call produces a written scope proposal with the exact price before any commitment. No pressure. If we're not the right fit, I'll say so.

How to start

Two paths, both free:

About me

I'm Ravi Patel. I built and ship three production AI SaaS solo — Prism (an OpenAI-compatible AI gateway competing with Portkey and Helicone), Citare (AI search visibility tracker across AIO / ChatGPT / Perplexity / Gemini), and BatchWise (Indian compliance marketplace). I write practitioner notes on the work at rikuq.com.

The advisory practice exists because of a structural gap in the market: technologists deep enough to optimise LLM infrastructure usually don't do finance work, and finance professionals deep enough to handle Section 195 / GST RCM / Ind AS classification usually don't understand AI infrastructure well enough to optimise it. I sit in that gap and have shipped enough production AI to know what actually breaks vs. what only looks scary on a slide.